The intervention of Antonio Pasini University 'di Siena :
' A bit of consideration on this thing foundations.
to take it so 'as it appears, it seems a joke, a canard, or a
'idiocy. It is no wonder that for months the whole country will
reasons as if it could be a serious matter.
Certainly the foundations may not be the first step in a process of privatization
University ', just' cause in our country
such a process can not 'never even start, except
marginal achievements, however, that' already 'are outstanding, and for a long time. If anything,
will be another step in the transformation of this country in a bad place
based on power and commercialization (the one politician who
and 'much worse than academic).
Let me explain. A foundation requires one or more 'persons who financially support the
. And what would these people, in our case
?
Individuals? No, I do not think that in Italy there are private entities
with shoulders so wide as to make him a 'university'
too small to medium.
The budget of a university 'media, all inclusive, for travel on figures
eight zeros (in €). Not to mention the big university '. And who ever you want
wishing to provide money so 'important, for most of
' without a measurable return with any certainty? The most that can
'do a private party and' co-finance an undergraduate degree or a master
support or offer any scholarships. But this'
just what the various actors more 'or less private already' do without
need foundations. What could possibly be different
15 years ago when we still had large holdings of state or parastatal
large groups, sensitive to the reasons of policy, perhaps more 'than to those
business or market, and therefore more' inclined to embark on
companies of uncertain benefit, provided that 'appropriately advocated. But these institutions no longer exist
'at least ten years.
Public players, then. And what? Regions? But the trouble it
regions have already 'enough with the health system. Then, their main source of income and
'the IRAP tax that many would have wanted to abolish (
perhaps rightly), and maybe sooner or later will be' abolished. Some City,
then? Worse than going at night!
There remains only the state. We will therefore state foundations.
like it or not, you should say or not, so 'should be. Why 'and' the only possibility
'practicable. Apparently nothing unusual: the State will appear as the main socio
lender, so 'as it appears in
other institutions.
not change anything then? Not much would change: the state, rather than
'take care of the university system for
constitutional duty, and thus be answerable to the country of his
interventions or interventions, would be involved in this or that
universities' only insofar as the prevailing social . So, with no obligation
to the country and in a position to grant favors to his second
the convenience of the 'entourage of government or environments
it more 'neighbors. Sorry if it seems little.
Antonio Pasini - Universita 'di Siena "
to take it so 'as it appears, it seems a joke, a canard, or a
'idiocy. It is no wonder that for months the whole country will
reasons as if it could be a serious matter.
Certainly the foundations may not be the first step in a process of privatization
University ', just' cause in our country
such a process can not 'never even start, except
marginal achievements, however, that' already 'are outstanding, and for a long time. If anything,
will be another step in the transformation of this country in a bad place
based on power and commercialization (the one politician who
and 'much worse than academic).
Let me explain. A foundation requires one or more 'persons who financially support the
. And what would these people, in our case
?
Individuals? No, I do not think that in Italy there are private entities
with shoulders so wide as to make him a 'university'
too small to medium.
The budget of a university 'media, all inclusive, for travel on figures
eight zeros (in €). Not to mention the big university '. And who ever you want
wishing to provide money so 'important, for most of
' without a measurable return with any certainty? The most that can
'do a private party and' co-finance an undergraduate degree or a master
support or offer any scholarships. But this'
just what the various actors more 'or less private already' do without
need foundations. What could possibly be different
15 years ago when we still had large holdings of state or parastatal
large groups, sensitive to the reasons of policy, perhaps more 'than to those
business or market, and therefore more' inclined to embark on
companies of uncertain benefit, provided that 'appropriately advocated. But these institutions no longer exist
'at least ten years.
Public players, then. And what? Regions? But the trouble it
regions have already 'enough with the health system. Then, their main source of income and
'the IRAP tax that many would have wanted to abolish (
perhaps rightly), and maybe sooner or later will be' abolished. Some City,
then? Worse than going at night!
There remains only the state. We will therefore state foundations.
like it or not, you should say or not, so 'should be. Why 'and' the only possibility
'practicable. Apparently nothing unusual: the State will appear as the main socio
lender, so 'as it appears in
other institutions.
not change anything then? Not much would change: the state, rather than
'take care of the university system for
constitutional duty, and thus be answerable to the country of his
interventions or interventions, would be involved in this or that
universities' only insofar as the prevailing social . So, with no obligation
to the country and in a position to grant favors to his second
the convenience of the 'entourage of government or environments
it more 'neighbors. Sorry if it seems little.
Antonio Pasini - Universita 'di Siena "
0 comments:
Post a Comment